Archive Page One
Subject: Airport Security:
I have been in law enforcement for about 25 years until recently when I
left U.S. Customs in 1998. I also have a martial arts background of 33 years. I
was also in the United States Secret Service and was stationed in Washington,D.C.
protecting Presidents and their families at The White House as well as
protecting embassies and dignitaries.
I am considered an expert at screening people, luggage, vehicles, commercial trucks,
containers, commercial and private airplanes, ships and small
boats, military, dignitaries, etc....I was also cross trained as an INS official and
can process foreigners with passports.
I can say with confidence that there is not enough "proper" security
or
security personnel who are trained well enough to conduct proper screening
of persons who are boarding aircraft as well as their luggage.
I for one have been very critical of the way our government operates at the
nation's borders with regards to U.S.Customs and U.S. Immigration screening
procedures for at least 7 years.
I am also in touch with other "former" and "current" law
enforcement
personnel who confide in me on a daily basis about the horrible conditions
in which our government is allowed to operate.
One former Vietnam Vet and law
enforcement official who recently traveled
out of Lindbergh Field told me that a national guardsmen checked his
luggage by merely pushing on the luggage. Unless this young man was clairvoyant
or had X-Ray eyes, he did not do his job correctly. The luggage should have
been visually inspected after opening the luggage.
On another occasion another former law enforcement officer traveled from
Chicago and was NOT checked properly when the "metal wand" was used
for
detecting metal objects after setting off the "walk through" device.
The
female guard was challenged by the former law enforcement official and
asked why she did not check further if there was a possible metal object in
the
crotch area and the female guard stated, "Oh, we're not allowed to touch
people there. It's an invasion of privacy laws". This women security guard
was over the age of 50.
Let me explain further that hiring national guard personnel is not a good
thing unless they have been properly trained and know how to deal with the
public. I have worked with national guard units at the border since 1989
and a very small percentage last very long. Only national guard units with
assignments as M.P.'s or Military Police or who have a law enforcement
background should be allowed to conduct special security at check points.
I have seen other occasions where national guard are very helpful, but did
not really have the proper training and experience to be allowed to have
contact with the general public.
Now we are having these weekend warriors thrown at us with fully automatic
rifles. Not all of these national guardsmen are fully trained with law
enforcement backgrounds and some are females over the age of 40. I just
hope they can retain their weapons if they are challenged? If I was a
terrorist,
I wouldn't need to bring any weapons if I can take one away from an older
female or male guardsman with little difficulty. Weapons retention is one of
the more serious things you learn in law enforcement academies and martial
arts.
I have also been told that people weren't being checked properly at an airport
in Massachusetts and Vermont recently as well.
It is time we put people in charge of security at the airports who have a
specialized background and training. We can not rely on minimum wage
security guards who have no real expertise. I think we should
"Federalize"
all International Airports and deputize the security U.S. Marshal's.
I can also tell you about specific security problems at Lindbergh Field
with regards to my apprehending at least a "dozen" baggage
handler employees who
were caught violating the Federal Inspection areas while a "foreign"
commercial aircraft was being processed. They tried to enter the restricted
areas without a proper Customs security seal. (This is how they smuggle at
the airports as well as intercept undeclared merchandise on the plane that
never arrives in the Customs inspection areas)
I was not well liked by Customs management for doing my job.
I have recently communicated my
concerns to the White House and the Office
of Homeland Security without any real responses as of yet.
John Carman-Former U.S. Customs
Editor of www.customscorruption.com
Airport Security Too Lax
Travelers Complain
http://www.uniontrib.com/news/uniontrib/mon/news/news_1n5secure.html
By Jeff McDonald
STAFF WRITER
November 5, 2001
While federal lawmakers continue to argue over how best to safeguard airports
across the United States, passengers flying into and out of Lindbergh Field
since Sept. 11 are finding huge lapses in security.
According to an informal survey of airline passengers conducted by The Union-Tribune, striking inconsistencies exist between the way identification, tickets and luggage are checked in San Diego and elsewhere.
Air terminals in many American cities have yet to implement uniform standards for even the most cursory safety inspections.
Travelers may be passed through checkpoints in 10 minutes at one airport and delayed for hours at another. Pocket knives or other potential weapons are confiscated before some flights but are missed altogether before others.
Airline workers told to compare photo IDs with boarding passes often fail to make eye contact with ticket holders. Empty cars sometimes idle unchecked in front of passenger loading zones.
One flier said a guard at an airport metal detector could not speak enough English to ask a passenger to remove a laptop computer from its carrying case.
"If there is increased security at U.S. airports, the FAA is keeping it well hidden," said Shiela Rabell, an apartment manager from Alpine who traveled to Puerto Vallarta, Mexico, last month through San Diego and Phoenix.
Last week, The Union-Tribune asked readers to submit their recent travel experiences in letter form to an e-mail account set up by the paper. Sixty-eight people responded with stories of lax oversight, inattentive guards or airline employees and potential gaps in safety protocols.
In interviews and in the letters, many expressed worry that most checked luggage is not X-rayed or that suitcases are not routinely checked for matching to passengers once their flights arrive and they prepare to leave the airport.
Ed and Karyl Brabants of Tierrasanta traveled to Providence, R.I., two weeks after the terrorist attacks. They anticipated heavy security along the way, but were unpleasantly surprised.
"It was business as usual," said Ed Brabants, a retired postal worker. "We were stunned that there appeared to be no tightening of security at all."
During a journey last month to Central America, Tim and Amy Concannon twice made it through airports in Dallas and San Diego with a 2-inch Swiss Army knife dangling from a key chain.
"The knife was brought to our attention by the Costa Rican security," said Amy Concannon, an Escondido veterinarian who was surprised when inspectors returned the knife to her husband. "It was then missed again by American security on our return flight from Dallas to San Diego."
The hijackers accused in the Sept. 11 attacks are suspected of using box cutters to overwhelm flight crews and crash planes into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon.
Jane Dale wrote that when she traveled from San Diego to Alaska on Sept. 21, security crews confiscated a quarter-inch nail clipper but failed to inspect the contents of a lead bag designed to protect film from X-rays.
"It would seem that if they can't see it, it can't be dangerous," she said. "I could have carried a weapon on board undetected."
"It is time we put people in charge of security at the airports who have a specialized background and training," he said. "We cannot rely on minimum-wage security guards who have no real expertise."
Most other responses to the survey recounted stories of guards who failed to inspect identification or paperwork, metal objects slipping through detectors or agents who did not require proof from people claiming to be airline or airport employees.
Not all respondents were skeptical of the tightened security that has been publicized by government officials, however. A handful of fliers, like Dianne Lohner of Mira Mesa, praised the strict new enforcement policies.
"We were glad to see the extra security processes in place and definitely felt safe about flying," said Lohner, who returned Oct. 29 from a 10-day trip to Portland, Ore.
Federal legislation intended to plug holes in airport and airline security stalled last week in Congress, where dueling bills failed to muster majority support from both houses.
At issue is whether baggage checkers should become federal employees, a prospect most Republicans oppose. Democrats say private-security policies now in place do not adequately protect passengers.
Argenbright Security, for example, the nation's largest airport security firm, was accused by the Justice Department of hiring screeners with criminal records at Los Angeles International and other airports.
In San Diego, one of the companies that inspects Lindbergh Field filed for bankruptcy protection days after the terrorist attacks on New York City and the Pentagon, although the company said the filing was not linked to the attacks. Officials say local passengers remain safe.
Resolving the impasse on whether to turn airport security crews into federal workers is likely to take negotiators from the House and Senate weeks.
In the meantime, Jerry Snyder of the Federal Aviation Administration office in Los Angeles maintains that consistent standards for airline security at the nation's airports make air travel safe.
Yet, he added, "how those standards are achieved is given latitude for the various air carriers and their security forces."
Government investigators years ago identified major security breaches at American airports. In reports issued in 1993 and 1999, the inspector general of the U.S. Department of Transportation recommended sweeping reforms.
"Airport access control has been, and continues to be, an area of great concern," the 1999 report states.
According to inspectors, that analysis was all but ignored.
Even though federal regulations spell out specific responsibilities for airlines and airport managers, the extent of inspections can vary greatly from gate to gate and airport to airport.
"Everyone is doing a good job, but is it consistent? No," said Rita Vandergaw, spokeswoman for the San Diego Unified Port District, which oversees Lindbergh Field. "This is a challenge for us, as it is at many airports."
Rather than dividing responsibility for passenger safety inside the terminals between airports and carriers, Vandergaw said the port district would prefer that airports be given complete authority over security.
"If airports had the responsibility for which they're held accountable, anyway, you would get a more consistent (enforcement) standard," she said.
| October 18, 2001
OPM to
investigate suspicious appointments at Customs By Tanya N. Ballard The Office of Personnel Management plans to review
the circumstances surrounding several political appointments made at the
Customs Service over the last two years, according to a new General
Accounting Office report.
In 1998, the Treasury Department asked the Office
of Personnel Management for the authority to add 10 law enforcement
positions at Customs under the Schedule A excepted hiring authority,
without regard to competitive civil service rules. In asking for the
additional hiring authority, Treasury officials told OPM that because of
the ãsensitive natureä of the needed positions, publicly advertising
them was not desirable. OPM approved the positions and Customs went on
to fill nine of the positions between September 1998 and January 2001.
But in a new report, ãPersonnel
Practices: Circumstances Surrounding U.S. Customs Serviceâs Use of
Schedule A Appointment Authority,ä GAO said five of those
appointments raised eyebrows.
Many politically appointed federal employees
attempt to convert their work status from political appointee to career
civil servant shortly before a presidential election in an attempt to
remain in the executive branch÷a practice known as ãburrowing in.ä
Two of the Customs appointments, for a law
enforcement specialist and a public affairs specialist, were
inconsistent with Treasuryâs assertion that the needed positions were
ãsensitive in nature,ä GAO found. Later, Customs created identical
positions, advertised them and then hired the two appointees to fill
them.
Customs claimed they decided after appointing the
two employees that the positions were needed permanently at the agency.
Circumstances suggested that the two appointees might have had an unfair
competitive advantage in getting the jobs, GAO said. Still, GAO could
not determine that the two appointees would not have been hired based on
their education and work experience prior to joining Customs.
Two other appointments raised a red flag among
Treasury officials. Just before the Bush administration, two noncareer
Senior Executive Service employees were appointed--one as a law
enforcement appropriations officer and one as a strategic trade advisor.
Although OPM determined that both of the appointments were made with the
legitimate use of Schedule A authority, the agency, in its written
response to GAOâs report, said it was concerned about the appearance
of political favoritism surrounding these cases.
OPM is now planning its own review of all the
appointments, as well as a review of the original justification for
allowing the additional appointments.
|
| HAVE YOU
SEEN THESE MEN?
If you have...email: afotips@k-online.com or call the numbers on this poster |
|
Mexico Police Probe
Mystery Corpse
Associated Press Writer Saturday, February 23, 2002; 7:00 AM MAZATLAN, MEXICO öö The first parade of Carnaval was still hours away, but local families were already setting up folding chairs along Mazatlan's beachfront boulevard to be sure of a clear view. In the tourist-heavy Zona Dorada, state police agents called in to give extra security for the local version of Mardi Gras said they saw guns through the windows of a Volkswagen Bug cruising past bars, hotels and souvenir shops. They began to follow the vehicle around 10:30 a.m. The resulting chase on Feb. 10 left three men dead on the sidewalks. Nearly two weeks later, Mexican and U.S. officials are trying to figure out if one of them was Ramon Arellano Felix, allegedly one of the world's most violent drug traffickers and a fixture on the FBI's 10 Most Wanted list. "We are investigating, looking for evidence," Mexican Attorney General Rafael Macedo de la Concha said Friday as he accompanied President Vicente Fox on a tour of the Guatemalan border region. He said his agency is "exchanging information" with U.S. officials. "We have to exhaust all the tools that exist so that we can establish whether this hypothesis is a reality," he said. In Washington, DEA spokesman Michael Chapman said Friday that U.S. officials were investigating reports of the killing. The death of Arellano Felix would be a major blow to the Tijuana-based cartel allegedly run by he and his brothers, officials say. Ramon Arellano Felix is the security chief for a group accused of killing about 300 police, prosecutors, judges, rivals and a Roman Catholic cardinal over the past 15 years while shipping tons of cocaine, marijuana, heroin and amphetamines across the border. According to police accounts, the men in the Volkswagen drove into a parking garage near the Plaza Gaviota Hotel and fled on foot ö one briefly seeking shelter in the room of two Mexican college students who had come to play in a Carnaval band. Finally the suspects emerged and began exchanging shots with the police. One of the policemen and two of the suspects were killed. Two others were captured and another man ö who turned out to be a federal police officer ö was also arrested. All three have denied involvement. The bodies of the two suspects were sent to a local funeral home. A day later they were gone, turned over to people claiming to be relatives, according to workers at the funeral home who nervously refused to give further details and asked that even the name of their company be withheld for their safety. Federal police identity cards, found on both of the dead suspects, turned out to be false, state prosecutors said. Sinaloa state Deputy Attorney General Felipe Renault told a news conference Friday that one of the men was identified as Efrain Quintero Carrizoza, who was wanted for involvement in the Feb. 14, 2001, massacre of 12 people in Limoncito, a village not far from the state capital of Culiacan. That killing was believed to be drug related. The other man's card identified him as Jorge Perez Lopez. It carried the photo of a crop-haired man whose features otherwise looked remarkably like those of the shaggy-haired image of Arellano Felix that appears in FBI wanted posters alongside that of Osama bin Laden. The U.S. government has offered $2 million for Arellano Felix's capture. Funeral home workers told reporters only that state prosecutors had ordered them to release the bodies. State officials have refused to comment on the case, saying the matter is now being investigated by Macedo's federal Justice Department. Macedo said officials were "establishing what happened to the body" of the man they say could be Arellano Felix. "It's not in our possession," he said. Mexican police have arrested several alleged key operatives of the gang in recent years, but have failed to reach the Arellano Felix brothers, who are accused of offering millions of dollars in bribes to officials, and of butchering those who refuse them. Mexican prosecutors say the gang's victims include the late Roman Catholic Cardinal Juan Jesus Posadas Ocampo, who was shot to death in a fusillade of bullets at the Guadalajara airport in 1993. They say the Arellano Felix gang confused the cardinal's car with that of their target, rival drug gang leader Joaquin Guzman Loera. STORY CONTUNUED
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=25019 Tracking Terrorism
Last week I wrote about how vulnerable virtually every American citizen is to terrorism due to vast corruption in the U.S. Customs Service, whose job is to protect us from abuse of the expansive network of railways snaking across our great land. In recent years, this life-giving national arterial system has gradually been poisoned by drug cartels and terrorist networks who use the myriad railroad veins and spurs to transport their addictive and destructive goods. This threat first came to my attention by former Customs Agent-turned-whistleblower Darlene Catalan's chilling first-hand account of government efforts to silence her when she began to expose corruption within the department. Since last week I have been deluged with new information from train engineers, railway workers and brave government "whistleblowers" who have long known about this internal threat to national security. It seems many "in the know" have been concerned for quite some time about how vulnerable the system is to terrorist attacks. First, please understand what they report:
So here are the logical questions: Just when are bin Laden et al. going to use the railway system to transport biological, chemical or other warfare into the heartland of America? Are tanker cars already stationed throughout the U.S. just waiting to be exploded? Are "sleeper" terrorists lurking around our nation's train yards awaiting the word to attack? As Catalan explained to me last week, the routing of the tanker cars is directed via remote control. The leaser of the tankers need only to place their orders via the Internet or telephone. There is no system in place to verify the identity of those directing the shipments. And, as I have learned through additional information and research, there is every likelihood that whatever "on the ground" terrorist support is needed to achieve massive destruction through tanker cars could easily already be in place. This "clear and present danger" to American security must be addressed now. Gary Aldrich, a former 26-year veteran of the FBI, agrees: "As former agent Catalan has exposed, there is tremendous corruption along our borders which has allowed our country to be infiltrated by those who wish us harm. Honest agents on the ground are routinely thwarted in their attempts to protect our nation, leaving us and our railways extremely vulnerable to terrorist attacks." Aldrich should know, he's made it his mission to expose corruption in high places through supporting brave, credible "whistleblowers" from within government agencies. Aldrich is founder of the Patrick Henry Center, which seeks, in part, to "assist in the uncovering of serious wrongdoing in the federal government, will promote and protect every citizen's right to know, to speak out, and to correct corruptions no matter where they occur." It is crucial to understand just how porous our borders are to illegal aliens gaining access to our country by the thousands each week. We traditionally think of these illegal aliens as poor Mexicans attempting to gain access to a better life in America. But increasingly, the illegal aliens crossing into our country from both Canada and Mexico are identified by agents as "OTMs" ö border lingo for "other than Mexicans." An estimated one in 10 illegal aliens "caught" are from countries like Egypt, Iran or Yemen. How many get by undetected? Several of the scum involved in the brutal attacks of Sept. 11 entered the nation through Canada. Experts believe that there are many more currently among us who gained entry the same way, and many more attempting to enter even as you read this column. Former Secret Service agent, law enforcement official and U.S. Customs agent John Carman worked the Southwest Border for 15 years and still monitors the activity through official contacts and civilian sources. He recently told me, "At the present time, corruption along the borders is so bad and morale among the agents so low that it doesn't shock me in the least that Middle Eastern terrorists are making their way into our country undetected. I have gathered information that indicates certain INS officials have, just in the last year, been allowing the illegal entry of Middle Eastern nationals through the world's largest land border port at San Ysidro. Some of this information was stated to me by Iraqi nationals living in San Diego, who are relatives of other Iraqis waiting to be allowed entry into our country through political asylum or visas." The methods America uses to issue visas has long allowed individuals from countries that sponsor terrorism easy access to our communities. Some 3,700 U.S. consular offices around the world issue millions of visas every year. Eighty percent of the 8 million visa applications are approved by our State Department annually. As Phyllis Schlafly, a long-time advocate of halting the flow of illegal aliens into the country recently exposed, "The State Department manual used by consular officials states that 'mere membership' in a recognized terrorist group, or even 'advocacy of terrorism,' does not automatically disqualify a person from entering the United States." Indeed, On Oct. 16 WorldNetDaily's Washington Bureau Chief Paul Sperry broke the disturbing news that 14 Syrian pilots gained access to the U.S. on Oct. 14 and 15 through visas allowing them to attend flight school in Fort Worth, Texas. Syria, as anyone who has been following world events of late knows, is one of the key nations known to harbor and support terrorists. This single act is a disgrace to American security. The fact that it happened within a few weeks of thousands of innocent civilians losing their lives to terrorist thugs on our own soil, some even in the Pentagon, is unconscionable. It's time to demand answers and immediate responses by our government. The terrorists know of our vulnerability, and now you do too. Please do your part in alerting your elected officials.
|
|
An Actual Email Correspondence From: "John Carman" <jcarman@cts.com> To: "George W. Bush" <President@whitehouse.gov> Sent: Saturday, October 13, 2001 11:30 AM Subject: Fw: The Postal Connection Continued **************************************************************************** ***************************************** Dear Sir: If they can smuggle small amounts of Heroin, they can mail contaminated Anthrax as well. I hope you can use this information as I get it. It comes from people I trust who are still in Customs and Management isn't listening. God Bless! John Carman Editor- www.customscorruption.com **************************************************************************** ****************************************** ----- Original Message ----- From: Deleted For safety Reasons To: <jcarman@cts.com> Sent: Saturday, October 13, 2001 9:30 AM Subject: Re: The Postal Connection If you know the USPS they are getting all of the press that they need with the anthrax scare. What they don't say is that they prevent us from doing two legal things that would greatly facilitate the stopping of terrorist activities and money laundering. 1) They are the only carrier that actively prevents that Customs Service from "re-examining "freight that has initially cleared and is still in their possession. Imagine having a dog alert on a parcel at an airfreight facility that has been cleared on a "general" exam through selectivity processing and having the airline say, with the force of federal law enforcement officers, that we could not open the package. Well the Postal Service says that even though the parcel is still in their possession and no matter what the reason (dog alert, ticking bomb, parcel going to a known drug house, or just because it looks like it should be examined again [or for that matter for the first time] ) that even though the Customs Regulations and court decisions to the contrary and the fact that the imported parcel has not been legally "permitted" because it is still in the possession of the importing carrier, the Customs Service needs a Federal Search warrant to open the parcel. 2) The Postal Service still has not capitulated to the changes in laws regarding export examinations by Customs that were passed several years ago. The plain language of the law says that the merchandise is subject to examination by Customs when it is taken possession by the exporting carrier with "intent to export". If someone addresses a parcel to a foreign country, puts some stamps on it and puts in the hands of the Postal Service then aren't they intending to export the parcel and isn't the exporting carrier the Postal Service? The dopers and others love Express Mail. Check out the amounts of Express Mail going to Colombia and coming from Colombia. The dopers know that the Postal Service prevents us from examining export mail but not import mail. IF we are going to get involved with this new agency shouldn't we also be "law enforcement " as the agents and marshals are? When we were detailed to be domestic security at O'Hare after 9/11 we were sworn in as Special Deputy Marshals. We are armed, with vests, with the authority but not with the retirement or pay. What is wrong with this picture? From: Deleted |
Special Feature: Drug Warriors
What's New?
Un-sworn Declaration Under Penalty of Perjury
Here's the response from one of the illiterate sycophants still employed by the customs dept.
are
you happy now your a tattletale were all so proud
Darlene Responds First off , I would comment on
how the sender of this message is illiterate! "Your" is supposed
to be you're and "were" is supposed to be we're
and they failed to capitalize "are" at the
beginning of the sentence and failed to end the interrogatory sentence
with a question mark. Second off I would state the following: You folks may wish to email a response to Lyle's Cave...I mean Lyle Cave at lcgc52@gallatinriver.net and ask him what he has against the truth?
This Customs Memo, which was provided from a confidential Customs source, is from Raymond W. Kelly, dated September 13, 2000. A Customs Special Agent said it best after he
retired. He said what he left was ãa leaderless, lethargic, morally
bankrupt, ineffective agency that had been infected by the Peter Principle
for many yearsä before he arrived. He then went on to say that ãthe
Customs Service has now reached such an advanced stage of internal decay
that it functions only in theoryä. I think the following memo in large
part explains this and how the reign of such inept and disgraceful
managers such as Bonni Tischler and Chuck Winwood is allowed to continue. It is further proof of discrimination, unfair labor practices and possible violations of Federal laws dealing with the Privacy Act and FOIA laws within the U.S. Customs Service. This Memo was allegedly sent out to ALL Customs employees regarding the "Selection Review Process". It outlines the illegal use of an applicant's "entire past record" which may be "old" or "unverified" information. It is also a violation of the Union Contracts and Memorandum of understanding and possible Civil Rights violations with regards to releasing negative information about an Employee which causes unfair considerations for a new position or a promotion. It is also against the law to keep such "secret files" on anyone without divulging the existence of such a file. This information is clearly being denied and kept "secret". In doing so, it prevents anyone from being able to defend themselves in a legal process in which our Democratic form of government was founded. ~Editor~ |
Customs
Agent Ricardo Sandoval
Update: Still
Fighting to Get Awarded Damages! Jan. 8th hearing: Results in original
ruling being upheld in 9th Circuit Court of Appeals. U.S. Customs ordered to
pay, but still no relief for Mr. Sandoval as of April 20th, 2001.
Special Agent Ricardo Sandoval is still
fighting to get his awarded damages from the May 1998 court decision
by a San Diego federal jury under federal District Judge Judith Keep. A
settlement hearing is scheduled for January 8, 2001. ( Almost two full years
since he was awarded $200,000 for doing his job in the face of opposition from
his superiors at U.S. Customs Internal Affairs.) Special agent Sandoval has
experienced retaliation for doing his job and is still being harassed by Customs
managers and co-workers.
Lawsuit Puts Customs Service on Trial Part 1
Lawsuit Puts Customs Service on Trial Part 2
Customs agent is awarded $200,000 | Jury says he faced bias and retaliation
It has just been learned that Customs Special Agent Ricardo Sandoval has finally received his final check for the $200,000 damages regarding his 1st lawsuit against U.S. Customs which was decided back on or about May 14, 1998. The U.S. Treasury check was hand delivered by a special courier and signed for on or about May 11, 2001 and cleared on May 21, 2001. READ FULL STORY
UPDATE: Though Mr. Sandoval has received his settlement, he has reported that he is continuing to experience harassment.
Update to this Case: As a result of John Carman giving agents a heads-up, a surprise inspection was performed in early morning hours resulting in this story: Surprise check uncovers 1,018 pounds of marijuana hidden beneath five railway cars.
To this day, investigations are still being covered up...
"Railroad
Investigation Killed" ![]()
It has come to my attention over the last several months that one of several
major "NARCOTICS" investigations has been "killed" by very
high Customs Office of Enforcement (O.E.) SAIC's and RAC's in the Southern
California area.
I have also been told by very reliable sources in Customs, as well as former
Customs agents and state and local law enforcement officials on various
narcotics tasks forces, that one of the most major investigations into smuggling
by the U.S. railroad has become a major corridor through which tons of
"marijuana" and "cocaine" are entering into this country
"unchecked" everyday without inspection. (I am told that this
information is well documented through official reports within the Customs
agency and well placed in case of any further death threats and harassment by
rogue Customs Internal Affairs units or corrupt officials within Customs itself)
I have also been told that maybe these "other" suspected
"government agents" that have been involved in intercepting drug
shipments may be from another government agency out of Langley, Virginia. That
remains to be seen.
Just two years ago a railroad car was checked on a tip from reliable informants
and over 8 tons of marijuana was discovered with an additional amount of
cocaine. (Each railroad car, tanker, bin, or hopper can carry upwards of over
50,000 pounds of contraband each load. In some instances the various rail cars
can carry a maximum load of approximately 88,000 kilos or 193,600 lbs. of
contraband.
Since I worked in U.S. Customs at the San Ysidro Border Inspection Station for
over 15 years, I had occasion to inspect the "northbound" trains
entering into the U.S. via Tijuana at San Ysidro just east of the main Port of
Entry. (This is located just east and up the hill where over 6,000 vehicles and
pedestrians enter daily from Tijuana, Mexico. San Ysidro is the world's largest
land border port serving approximately 24 entry lanes with a potential maximum
load of over 14,400 vehicles and pedestrians per 24 hour shift, if ALL the entry
lanes were fully staffed and maintained.)
On occasion I was sent to accompany another Customs inspector and verify the
serial numbers of the rail cars as they entered the country from Tijuana,
Mexico. I also did this in Calexico, California at the Port of Entry, now called
Border Inspection Stations. We would then receive the appropriate manifests from
the rail road crew listing the various rail cars and their cargo contents. Most
ALL of the rail cars that contained cargo were sealed and required special
equipment or assistance in order to check or verify the cargo.
(What's interesting to note is that there is only ONE rail car weigh station in
Colton, California that can be used to verify the weights of the manifested
weights of the cargo. The only other weigh station is allegedly in Texas). All
other empty rail cars had to be checked "visually" as they entered.
NONE ARE WEIGHED. According to Customs laws, anything that entered the United
States was subject to inspection. (ref: 19 USC 482, 1581, just to name a few
laws)
The rail cars are supposed to be in such an order that the paperwork is easily
checked off for verification of serial numbers and is properly manifested. After
one of us unlocked the high security gate lock we would position ourselves on
either side of the rail cars along with Border patrol to control the entry of
the rail cars and prevent any further illegal entry of illegals. Once the rail
cars were all accounted for and secured on the north side of the border, the
gate is secured and locked once again. (It should be noted that the gate is NOT
manned 24 hours a day and is only checked a maximum of 1 hour each day for
northbound traffic. All other times it is NOT maintained.
Special Note: On several occasions these rail cars were NOT in proper order and
there were discrepancies noted. On other rare occasions, the
"railroad" personnel took the liberty of letting the railcars in at
their convenience and NOT the convenience of the U.S. Customs Service. On
several other instances the northbound gate lock had been totally broken into
and the gate left open by smugglers. You could have driven a couple of trucks
through that gate, not to mention a whole railroad full of rail cars.
U.S. Border Patrol Agents are usually stationed near by to watch and prevent any
possible entry of "illegals" coming from Mexico while the rail cars
enter from Tijuana. I occasion I have spotted and intercepted Mexican illegals
trying to hitch a ride on board the railcars. This is very dangerous and
hazardous as some illegals have lost their lives due to train accidents from
trying to board a moving train or from exiting before the train stops. They
usually hide in the "empty" cargo bins or open rail cars that contain
no cargo.
Not only is there the threat of illegal "human cargo" but the threat
of narcotics coming in by the tons.
According to very "reliable" sources in the government and other law
enforcement agencies, there was information that tons of narcotics was entering
into the United States by way of special rail cars. This is NOT a new scenario.
According to a 1998 seizure which occurred at the railroad near one of the
border stations, over 8,000 pounds of marijuana and cocaine was discovered and
seized by Customs agents. Two years later the same railroad yard was still
experiencing problems with theft and pilfering of merchandise totaling over
$11,000,000 million dollars worth of cargo each year. Think about it. That's a
lot of expensive cargo without the threat of illegal contraband.
While conducting a special investigation regarding these reliable
"sources" Customs Agents and other law enforcement officials came
across a situation where there were two "independent" and
"different" sources of information that confirmed that there were
"U.S. Government" or "law enforcement" looking types that
were committing thefts on some of these "special" rail cars after they
were being held for further processing and maintained before the final the
destination was completed. Some of these "U.S. Agent" look-a-likes had
short haircuts and carried AK-47's for protection while unloading contraband.
Which agency issues AK-47's to it's agents? (According to other government
agents I have spoken to, no legitimate U.S. agency issues AK-47's at this time)
When word of this reached Customs agents working this investigation heard of
this, they passed this on to their superiors for further investigation and
permission to pursue search warrants and arrest warrants dealing with the
narcotics that was entering through the use of these rail cars.
What happens next is very puzzling. According to the "government"
sources, the SAIC's and RAC's "ordered" the investigation stopped
immediately. There was a very aggressive tone to this order and NO reason was
given. The agents working this case were not only "ordered off" the
investigation, but they were further "threatened" with various types
of retaliatory "administrative" actions and reprimands that were
totally uncalled for. It was obvious to these good Customs agents that they were
being told to "back off" and "stand down". When one or two
of the agents asked about the status of the investigation when he/she was told
they were possibly going to be removed, the SAIC told them "the
investigation is dead". That is was going no where. They were further told
that any pursuit of this investigation would be cause for removal.
WOW! There you have it! A high ranking Customs official ordering his own Customs
agents off of an investigation for no apparent reason or justification.
(Information has it that one of these high ranking Customs officials retired
within the year to the private sector) The harassment still exists against the
remaining loyal and hard working Customs agents and several others who resigned
in order to avoid the fallout of the corrupt agency.
Please see the attached "sample" photos and you will see various types
of rail cars that enter the United States everyday. These particular photos were
taken at the San Ysidro Port of Entry just last month September 2000. To my
knowledge, none of these pictured rail cars are under any current investigation
for smuggling.
This information was passed on to Customs Internal Affairs and the Treasury OIG
without any positive results. The FBI and the Department of Justice was also
notified by myself as well as several others from within the Customs Service
without any response. (The FBI contact was special agent Robert W. Meza in the
San Diego office (619)514-5860 or (619)565-1255 ) This was done around April or
May of 1999. Here it is October 2000 and still NO response.
Failure to take action on direct evidence of corruption or smuggling activity by
members of the U.S. Treasury Department, U.S. Customs Service, or the FBI of the
Department of Justice is a felony and dereliction of duty and obstruction of
Justice. There are only a few instances where such an important investigation is
NOT pursued. Neither of those situations have been cited as the reasons for
killing the investigation regarding the railroad smuggling cases and the failure
of the Customs Supervisory officials from taking appropriate action.
FOLLOW-UP
http://sanantonio.bcentral.com/sanantonio/stories/2001/10/08/story1.html
| Over the past several weeks,
we as a nation have been on high alert, open to unprecedented incursions
into our privacy in the effort to stem the threat of terrorism. We have
been willing to endure luggage searches and long waits at our airports,
metal detectors at our borders, and pat downs at our sporting events.
All this is being done as part of the united effort to prevent the
terrorists from coming to us. But what if our enemies aren't coming?
Instead, what if they are plotting to bring the horror of terror into
our communities from remote locations? That is precisely what former
U.S. Customs Service special agent Darlene Fitzgerald-Catalan asserts
that we must guard against. Catalan claims further that she has evidence
to back up her warnings. That evidence points to our nation's railroad
system. Catalan, as well as other government whistleblowers, claim that
the nation's railcars -- and the system that is used to transport them
to every nook and cranny of the country -- can be used by terrorists as
weapons to inflict devastating harm on Americans. Catalan adds that the
government must take action now to deal with the threat. The issue first
came to light, according to Catalan, during a major investigation she
helped spearhead in the late 1990s. The investigation, she adds,
uncovered a narcotics smuggling operation in Southern California that
was making use of railcars to move illegal drugs across the Mexican
border into the United States. Catalan claims that higher-up Customs
managers mysteriously "torpedoed" her investigation, which she
contends linked the smuggling operation to the Arellano-Felix drug
cartel in Mexico. Catalan alleges that in the wake of trying to blow the
whistle on the "torpedoed" investigation, she was subjected to
retaliation and severe emotional abuse, which included a death threat,
that eventually led her to resign from her job in 1999. "I had
seized eight thousand pounds of marijuana and 32 kilos of cocaine in a
pressurized rail tanker car," Catalan recounts in a recent
statement prepared for the Senate Governmental Affairs Subcommittee on
International Security, Proliferation and Federal Services. She adds in
the statement that the drugs were shipped into the United States from a
rail yard in Guadalajara, Mexico, that "was under the direct
control of the infamous Arellano-Felix (drug) cartel. Catalan's
statement was originally submitted to the Senate subcommittee in July in
support of proposed amendments to the Whistleblowers Protection Act.
Catalan redrafted the statement in the wake of the Sept. 11 terrorist
attacks and has sent copies to every U.S. senator, numerous U.S.
representatives as well as the Government Accountability Project (GAP)
in Washington, D.C. -- which is lobbying in support of reforms to the
Whistleblowers Protection Act. Doug Hartnett, a spokesman for GAP, says
Catalan's redrafted statement was submitted to the Senate subcommittee
this week. "This information (concerning the possible use of
railcars by terrorists) isn't something that dedicated terrorists
committed to blowing something up couldn't figure out on their
own," Hartnett says. By making this information public, the goal is
not "to put Xs on our vulnerabilities," but rather to get our
government agencies to adjust to the threat, Hartnett explains. "To
not do anything for fear of evildoers getting ideas is kind of what put
us in the situation we are in. There were people pointing out the lax
security at our airports long before the Sept. 11 attacks." Former
Customs special agent Sandy Nunn submitted a similar statement to the
Senate subcommittee in July as well. Nunn, who also resigned from her
job at Customs in 1999, has joined Catalan in blowing the whistle on the
aborted railcar investigation. "After further investigation,
Darlene determined that ... well over 100 of these tanker cars with
similar weight characteristics and so forth had passed into the commerce
of the United States undetected by inspection and investigators,"
Nunn says in her statement to the subcommittee. "What was in those
tanker cars remains a mystery." Who's listening? Over the past two
years, Catalan says she and several other current and former Customs
employees, including Nunn, have attempted to spur investigations into
why the railcar smuggling investigation was shut down. Among the
agencies they have contacted are the FBI and the U.S. Office of Special
Counsel. "Seven of us laid this rail operation out to the
FBI," Catalan explains. "We made this problem crystal clear in
terms of how these railcars can be controlled." She says, to date,
no one in the government has done anything. After consulting with her
attorneys, Catalan says she was convinced that it was time to come
forward with additional information on the railcar investigation,
particularly in light of the Sept. 11 terror attacks. "They (the
attorneys) said I have an obligation to go public," Catalan says,
"that I can't wait until after something gets blown up, only to
say, `I told you so.'" And so, Catalan is making available to the
media the same statement she sent to congressional members and GAP.
According to that statement, the same railroad tanker cars being used to
smuggle drugs could easily be converted for use in an even more sinister
smuggling operation: "... These (rail) tanker cars are the perfect
instruments for a terrorist attack against the U.S. As previously
stated, anyone with cash and phony identification can lease or sublease
these cars using a front company as the importer/exporter of record. ...
The terrorist would simply lease/sublease a tanker car -- even more
easily accomplished south of the U.S. border -- and pay cash to set up
an account with any of the major railroads. "... These tanker cars
can be remotely sent to any railroad spur that is put up for lease by
any private industry/citizen willing to lease their spur. ... Then the
terrorist can remotely move them and, if need be, abruptly change the
routing of these cars via a simple phone call to their customer service
rep or via the Internet, from anywhere in the world." Catalan, who
is trained in counter-terrorism tactics, goes on to state that these
"metal, cylindrical-shaped" rail tanker cars could easily be
converted into giant "pipebombs" that could be detonated
remotely. Who's watching? Catalan, in her statement, asserts that
pressurized rail tankers are not being systematically checked by Customs
as they cross the border. That claim is backed up by sources within
Customs who explain that there are thousands of railcars crossing the
Mexican and Canadian borders daily and inadequate resources to
thoroughly check each one. Further, in the case of pressurized tanker
cars, special hazardous materials teams need to be called in to complete
inspections, an expensive and time-consuming process. John Carman, a
former uniformed officer with the U.S. Secret Service as well as a
former U.S. Customs Inspector, agrees with that analysis as well. Carman
says he was among the first people within Customs to identify the
railcar smuggling problem, and, along with Nunn, Catalan and others, has
been instrumental in blowing the whistle on the lack of attention to the
issue. "If I can smuggle drugs on these railcars, I can smuggle
anything," Carman explains. "Customs simply does not have
enough time or people to inspect all of these railcars. If one or more
of these railcars (loaded with explosives or biological agents) got
through, it could do a lot of damage." That fact is underscored,
Catalan adds, by the vastness of this nation's rail system. "Now
consider the fact that one can simply remotely send these giant
instruments of death, simultaneously, to any one of thousands of rails
spurs, virtually undetected," Catalan says in the statement
prepared for the Senate subcommittee. "... Now add to this the fact
that once this is done, the perpetrators will be extremely difficult to
trace and no suicide bombers are needed." Catalan says rail spurs
are located near major buildings throughout the country. She adds that
an even more frightening scenario would be if one or more
explosive-laden rail tanker cars were to be detonated in a major urban
rail yard -- where hundreds of other railcars loaded with hazardous
materials are located. "These tanker cars in general carry a
plethora of hazardous material," Catalan told the Business Journal.
"If one or more is blown up in a rail yard, it could start a
devastating chain reaction." Catalan contends that a task force
needs to be organized immediately that is well-trained to address the
rail threat. Officials with U.S. Customs headquarters in Washington,
D.C., did not provide comment on Catalan's claims and the potential
railcar threat by the Business Journal's deadline. John Bromley,
spokesman for the Omaha, Neb.-based Union Pacific Railroad Co., says the
railroad does track information on railcars such as weight, destination
and the type of commodities being transported. "But we don't
inspect the cars to ensure the commodity that is supposed to be in them
is actually in there," he adds. "We do not open the cars. If
someone in the government is doing that, I can't say." Bromley did
say, though, that the railroad is on high alert in the wake of the
recent terror attacks and is taking steps to address security concerns.
"We have increased security on the railroad due to the Sept. 11
attacks," he explains. "But we can't discuss scenarios or what
might happen. ... "However, we are concerned with hazardous
materials and our infrastructure and other issues, and we are taking a
hard look at it with our security teams and have been meeting with
government officials."
To see other Business Journal coverage of U.S. Customs, go to http://sanantonio.bcentral.com/sanantonio/stories/2001/10/01/story2.html . John Carman also operates a Web site at: ( http://www.customscorruption.com |
Family denies illegal acts on either side of border
06/02/99
By Tracey Eaton / The Dallas Morning News
MEXICO CITY - Mexican billionaire Carlos Hank Gonzalez, his two sons and their associates oversee a sprawling criminal and business empire that stretches into the United States, says a new report by a U.S. Department of Justice agency.
"Several years of investigative information strongly support the conclusion that the Hank family has laundered money on a massive scale, assisted drug trafficking organizations in transporting drug shipments and engaged in large-scale public corruption," reads the report's executive summary, which was obtained by The Dallas Morning News. "Through its financial strength, political influence and criminal associations the Carlos Hank Gonzalez family remains a central, dynamic force in Mexico."
Members of the family, which has wielded immense political and economic power in Mexico for decades, could not be reached for comment.
They have vehemently and repeatedly denied any criminal ties. Carlos Arguelles, a spokesman for Mr. Hank Gonzalez, has called such accusations "a pack of lies."
"It seems to be the same information regurgitated over and over. From our standpoint, it's not true," said Richard Stern, a lawyer with Marketing by MIR, a California firm associated with the Hank family's sports-betting outlets in Mexico.
The report was prepared by the National Drug Intelligence Center, a federal agency under the Department of Justice. Run mostly by former agents from the Drug Enforcement Administration and the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the agency reviewed more than 70,000 U.S. law enforcement documents before concluding that the Hank family has links to Mexico's criminal syndicates, including the violent Arellano-Felix drug gang in Tijuana and the Juarez smuggling cartel.
The agency, based in Johnstown, Pa., was established in 1993, has a $30 million annual budget and produces coinfidential reports for counternarcotics agencies and key policy-makers.
'Signficant threat'
It specializes in developing intelligence on worldwide criminal organizations that threaten U.S. security interests. And its report on the "Grupo Hank" alleges that the family and its associates "pose a significant threat to the United States."
"The Hank family has purchased, or exercises control over, several U.S. banks, investment firms, transportation companies, and real estate properties," the report says.
"Carlos Hank Gonzalez's family associates closely with the leaders of the largest organized crime groups in Mexico through business partnerships, cooperative criminal activity, and personal relationships," the report says.
The suggestion that there may be links between one of Mexico's most powerful families and organized crime is especially relevant now as contenders for the Mexican presidency jockey for position.
The ruling Institutional Revolutionary Party, of which Mr. Hank Gonzalez has been a prominent leader for decades, has dominated the country for 70 years. Foes of the party say that it has remained in power so long, in part, because it has accepted money from criminals.
Said the report, "Unquestionably, the Carlos Hank Gonzalez family's greatest strength has been its political influence. As a PRI loyalist since the 1940s, Carlos Hank Gonzalez held some of the highest political offices and built a network of political allies. The current government is replete with individuals who owe their careers to Carlos Hank Gonzalez."
Mexico City's El Financiero first disclosed on Sunday the National Drug Intelligence Center report on the Hank family.
Government ties
Mr. Hank Gonzalez, 71, nicknamed "The Professor," began his career as a rural schoolteacher, rose through the ranks of the PRI and held several posts in government, including Mexico City mayor, Mexico state governor and federal secretary of tourism.
He retired from politics after Mexican President Ernesto Zedillo took office in 1994 but continues to attract attention - and controversy - in Mexico.
"Carlos Hank Reappears," read a headline in Sunday's Reforma newspaper, reporting that Mr. Hank Gonzalez attended his granddaughter's wedding on Saturday after a short hospital stay earlier in the week. Some Mexicans have speculated that his health was failing; his aides said he merely had a checkup.
In any case, his granddaughter's wedding in Mexico state showed he still has considerable clout. The guest list of more than 1,500 included former President Jose Lopez Portillo, several Cabinet members, governors and assorted other VIPs.
Inroads in U.S.
The family has tried to extend its reach into the U.S. gambling industry, the report said. Mr. Hank Gonzalez's youngest son, Jorge Hank Rhon, operates a string of sports-betting outlets and the Caliente dog track in Tijuana and wants to expand into the United States, according to the agency.
The older son, Carlos Hank Rhon, has controlling interest in Laredo National Bank and other business enterprises.
Robert Tortoriello, a lawyer for Laredo National Bank, said U.S. bank regulators have examined Carlos Hank Rhon's background very carefully and have not prevented him from operating the bank and adding branches.
He said that if any of the allegations against Mr. Hank Rhon were true, he has no doubt that U.S. authorities would have taken action against the family.
"Money laundering is a very serious thing," he said.
Members of Mexico's political opposition complain that the Mexican government has done little to prevent money launderers and other criminals from contributing to the PRI.
Link to politicians
Carlos Cabal Peniche, a suspected Mexican money launderer now in prison in Australia, said in a recent letter to the Miami Herald that he raised $25 million for three PRI candidates in 1994. Fifteen million dollars allegedly went to Luis Donaldo Colosio, the PRI presidential candidate who was assassinated during the 1994 campaign.
An additional $5 million was raised for Mr. Colosio, and after the candidate's murder, the funds were sent to the campaign of his successor, Ernesto Zedillo, the current president. Mr. Cabal Peniche said he raised another $5 million for Roberto Madrazo, who won the governor's race in Tabasco state and is now vying for the PRI's presidential nomination.
A spokesman for Mr. Zedillo said the presidential campaign contributions were legal and properly documented with electoral authorities.
This plaque was dedicated to the San Diego
Zoo by then Customs Commissioner Carol Hawlett. This was regarding the rare
White Tiger, which is endangered and was previously seized by Customs Inspectors
at the Southbound lanes to Tijuana from San Diego. This Endangered White Tiger
which was owned by Caliente Race track owner Jorge Hank-Rhon was being smuggled
without proper permits into Tijuana for his personal zoo. Jorge Hank-Rhon is a
"known" Customs violator and is very close personal friends with
Customs managers here in San Diego. (Alan J. Rappoport, Jerry Martin, John
"Jack" Maryon)
Maryon was the Branch Chief at Otay Mesa that "ordered" me not to put
Jorge Hank-Rhon's name into the TECS lookout system. Hank-Rhon is a known
violator and has smuggled hundreds of thousands of U.S. Currency into or out of
the United States on various occasions. He has also been caught smuggling into
his own country of Mexico at Mexico City and has never been incarcerated yet. He
merely pays people off and gets his way. He is very rich and operates on the
golden rule. He who has the most gold, makes the rules!
By the way, the plaque which was attached to this rather large rock, no longer
exists at the zoo. Both the rock and the plaque have disappeared and I do not
know of their whereabouts. Mr. Jorge Hank-Rhon probably got someone to have it
"removed" or he bought it for a small "donation" to the San
Diego Zoo. That's a pretty big stone it was attached to by the way. It must have
weighed about 200 lbs or more.
Mexico's powerful Hank family goes after U.S.
prof over leak. San Diego Union Tribune 08/17/2000